They believe that with enough time and chance - just maybe some unscientific reactions may beat the odds and "improve all by themselves." God can then be ignored and evolutionists can claim to be logical and forward thinking in their ignorance of what's most important in this life.
But if the long eons just weren't there in the first place then evolution falls like a house of cards.
We will deal with carbon dating first and then with the other dating methods.
Carbon has unique properties that are essential for life on Earth.
For example, you cannot find fossils of modern man past 250,000 years ago.
it is only good for the most part for a 5000-10,000 year span.
THere are some assumptions one has to make when dating using radio metric dating.
Similar kinds of problems are seen in the case of potassium-argon dating, which is considered one of the most reliable methods. Andrew Snelling, a geologist, points out several of these problems with potassium-argon, as seen in Table 7.
know the true age, then how can it be trusted to give us the correct age for rocks that had no human observers to record when they formed?